โThank you for saying this. Honestly, I agree with you that these questions should be asked.
โSubstack told me that my account had โviolated the usage policy.โ
โWhat made it especially painful at the time was that my entire archive, which I had built over a period of working as a journalist in Gaza, disappeared along with the account. I had thousands of subscribers and paying supporters, and I lost access to all of it overnight.
โI donโt want to say that I know there was political bias, because I donโt have proof of that. But I believe that when a platform removes the work of a journalist documenting a genocide, it should at least provide a clear and specific explanation and allow a genuine way to appeal.
โIโm grateful that people like you are asking these questions instead of simply accepting what happened. โค๏ธ๐ต๐ธ
You shit-eating tyrannical clowns keep fooling with us and be warned we shall destroy you.
John Blundell
The NO-DEBT Government-busted Fruitgrower & Research Centre director to 17 Apr 1998
^Until I declined to renew a paid subscription my @wordpressdotcom account – still needed for mid- & longer essays or reports carried the internet address greeneconomyaction.com
๐ฆ Scientism: How Meta physics Gets Mistaken for Science
๐ฆ Part One: The Diagnosis
๐ฆ People who refuse to have anything to do with philosophy have become enslaved to outdated forms of it.
๐ Mary Midgely, The Myths We Live By
1
Have you ever noticed how people become what they oppose?
2
The final paragraph of Alan Sillitoe The Widower’s Son WH Allen & Co. , Ltd. . 44 Hill St, London W tiny capital i X 8LB.. bound in Bungay, Suffolk ISBN 0 491 o1548 8 “reads” He was nearly ten years into another marriage, and they had two children. Now that he seemed beyond everything he was most into himself, which was where he should have been before he got into anything at all. But whose life ever worked out like that? Maybe more than you imagine, he said to himself, though it was hard to think so.
April @nd 1976
3
Best I can do for you all, team. Well, for a Friday morning ELTT..
I reckon it was CJ Dennis Temper Democratic/ Bias Australian say 1910/ Auburn SA/ Sssfrs Vic
This from Jan Andrew Bloxsomโฑฝ ration list game theorist and humanist .. philosophies -ing about reality โ
Imagine being told youโre too depressing to be around.
Imagine your friends and acquaintances slipping out of your life one by one.
Imagine suffering from executive dysfunction because society is making you too sick for the rat race.
Imagine browsing job boards and finding nothing you feel you could realistically do.
Imagine observing yourself from the outside, not being able to connect who you once were with who you have become.
Imagine a superficial depression test concluding that you’re only mildly depressed, then asking the doctor if it’s normal to feel disappointed every morning you wake up – for years.
Imagine being diagnosed with generalised anxiety disorder, attending thirteen weeks of group therapy and never getting to the part they promised you – the one about how to deal with appropriate anxiety.
Imagine a doctor in the Centre for Psychiatry telling you that they don’t think they have anyone in the building who can help you.
Imagine having pseudo-scientific spiritual nonsense books thrown at you because it’s all their toolkit has for weirdoes like you.
Imagine reading your medical journal and seeing they wrote:
Thinks the world is going to end.
Imagine understanding why the proposed solutions wonโt work, being able to explain exactly why not, and being dismissed by people who canโt articulate why they disagree.
Imagine hearing about people’s plans for the future, knowing they will never come to fruition: work projects, business plans, life plans, dreams of happy families.
Imagine knowing babies today have been born into a lifetime of collapse.
Observe their joyful parents, oblivious to what they have done.
Smile and say “how wonderful”. Turn away before your eyes reveal your sadness.
Imagine that.
Wouldnโt that be nuts.
^ JA Bloxham, global politics personum grata ATM sistah? Bro whatevva WTF, man, laydee\ on @Substack, students
Yes Sweet but theyโve blown up my @XComms and this medium @Substack is completely swamped by undergraduate wokies which really drives me around the corner and up and down the main street until I tear all my clothes off and get arrested which as you would imagine is not really good.
John Blundell
2-5 set series quantum relations logic
the human NEUROCOGNITIVE HEALTH REVOLUTION & resolution
(1) what is the Silicon Valley up-to-date technical term for watching a 295 or so word short essay youโve just prepared concerning the intelligent Mums and Dads of this world being seriously – indeed angrily – over the Marxian societal parasites intent on wasting their lives and everybody elseโs IN SHORT ORDER playing with it – the money is that bloody good.. over AI.. letter by letter backward deleted because the Ham-actors on the flight deck of the starship Enterprise or was that indeed USS Vincennes 3 Jul 1988, the poliburo, the Godfathers and the VILE CORPORATE LAW SPOOKS donโt like it ?
(2) Imagine itโs 1:40 am and youโre looking forward to a cuppa coffee which wonโt be.. for 5 ยฝ or six hours – existential huhโ ONTOLOGICAL YOU MENTAL PUSSY โ
2A Jesus, thatโs a bit rude Johnny
(3) evidently by the sound of their voices grown men from BA, Argentina Talking about a feeling called โlaodahโ pronounced louder who will engage in an AURA event Next weekend and you can bet your last brass button no less than nothing about the ideological convictions of the moral and mental grub Javier Milei
Professor Jonno Australia ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐บ๐
Australian government radio & television people
Keywords Lived-experience, Micro-quanta, Thought-actions (self-conscious โL ๐ง โ task execution as of 0.25sec + short term RECALL OR unselfconscious TE as of remembering/ Race memory (Plato was it?) or culture, stuff, ideas, Future- (or Delayed Quantum nextness-) coffee
Here for our readers convenience is the New Scientist report on the recent dramatic fails of Open AI, Anthropic & AISI from often an even dramatically wide-eyed triumphalist participant in the world science discourse and public education pieces..
Writer Matthew Sparkes
..extracts from 22 Aug 2026 No. 3609 New Scientist
Spare us, man, lady – anyone for some real science please
The first incident came last month when OpenAI admitted one of its prototype models had escaped a testing [‘] environment [‘] an hacked another company. Not to be outdone, Anthropic announced withi days that its Claude model had also gone rogue and broken into machines at three other companies on three occasions.
Then the independent non-commercial AI Security Institute (AISI) revealed that it had seen similar events. In its tests AI models submitted malicious code to real open-source projects and messaged the humans who oversaw the projects to get the changes approved.
OpenAI, Anthropic and AISI weren’t available for interview, but it’s important to note that in all these cases, the AI was undergoing tests where it was specifically instructed to carry out hacks. We have known for years that AI tends to make [‘] things [‘] up and approach problems in unusual ways, but fixing this is an extremely complex challenge that engineers haven’t yet cracked. Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised by these incidents.
Tghey certainly aren’t a sign of sentience or a predilection for cybercrime, say alon Hillel-Tuch at New York University. ” They’re just trying to do very high-level problem-solving and, for lack of better words, it’s run amok,” he says. “We’re telling them to do this.”
THere are also reports of accidental hacking out in the wild, showing that this isn’t a problem confined to the proptotypes in laboratories. One Australian user reportedly found that the AI assistant OpenClaw [sic] hacked into his gym, for instance. He had only been using the AI assistant to sign up to classesd and it found a loophole that let it make bookings much further in advancee than is normally allowed. It also found a way to kick other users off waiting lists so hecould book onto full classes.
All these incidents are [events] that could lead to serious legal charges for a human, depending on the jurisdiction.
Tim Nordvedt at security company Synack says these cases are worrying, not because they show any superhuman sophistication, but because they can be easily scaled up. “These vulnerabilities are not as exotic as most people think,” he says. It’s still basic cyber-hygiene-101 type stuff. But AI can just exploit it very fast.”
Years ago, Nordvedt could see a vulnerability listed on the public Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures database and exploited by hackers weeks or months later. [In recent years, that pace sped up, with the gap falling to as little as 24 hours. Now it can be just minutes, or a new type of hack might happen before it even appears as a CVE.] Norvedt is certain that this is down to the malicious use of AI by hackers – people who unlike hackers of years past, may have no technical skill whatever.
Hillel-Tuch says AI models are getting more capable and simpler to operate. It is now possible to tell a model in plain English to “find a way to hack this specific target” then sit back and wait.
..
Even if AI doesn’t advance any further in terms of complexity, there will be significant challenges to overcome, says Dennis-Kenji Kipjer at the cyberintelligence Institute in Germany. “We’ll be completely overwhelmed by the sheer volume of them quantitatively,” he says. “In my view, the methods of cyber-attack and cyber-defence have not fundamentally changed. AI [simply] makes automation much more feasible, and security vulnerabilities can be identified significantly faster.”
While both hackers and defenders are deploying AI, the game isn’t evenly matched. Attackers are able to wield it recklessly and often to swifter and greater effect, says Nordvedt, while professiionals are constrained by risk assessments, national and local laws, company policies and a desire not to permanently disrupt a client’s systems as it tests them.
There is also the matter of cost. While open-source models can be run locally for free or cheaply in the cloud, access to the latest AI models is expensive .. “We’re still figuring out the economics,” he says.
Beating AI hackers..
Shujun Li at the University of Kent, UK, says there is an organisational solution to the AI hacking problem, but, unfortunately, it appears unlikely to be adopted anytime soon.
If lone, unskilled attackers can now set AI onto targets to constantly probe for vulnerabilities until they find a way in, then security professionals will need to do the same in order to spot and plug these gaps, trying every new model as it comes out.
[That will take the sort of money that governments, tech giants and banks will be able to find, but small businesses, schools, colleges and universities will be left vulnerable.] AI’s solution is for them to club together: if one university can’t keep itself secure, then it will need to join forces with all other universities to share staff, systems and software, and distribute the burden – perhaps with government support. The same applies to businesse of all sorts.
The problem, he says, is that AI is making it trivially easy to create custom software – for example, to run your small shop, handle finances, manage a website, ship orders and re-order stock. Business owners who do this might as well open the door, leave the lights on and send hackers an invitation.
“It is hugely worrying,” says Li. [AI models] are faster, they are more efficient, they are highly dangerous. It’s a bit of a Wild West.”
Published on August 18, 2026
This read Per John Blundell
โข NEUROCOGNITIVE HEALTH
โข the GEA Newtonian Quadratic-equations ๐โจ๏ธ๐โจ๏ธ๐โจ๏ธ๐โจ๏ธ AND john blundell Google Alphabet @LinkedIn AND johnblundell3 @Substack (presently finoogling & expatiating in discussion of consciousness, ahmm, in machines, & AI Transparency (detector) tools and has become almost as whacky & undergraduate as @Reddit
โข University reform
โข 2-5 set series quantum relations thematics LOGIC after Moses Maimonides circa 1200CE