I awoke just not now but then at 5:24 Ante- meridian pondering thought – a conceptual 4 mental steps ever followed by the imaginitive learningful newness of that the intended, the next, the lively conscious ethical.. the ought, the gnostic as inseparable and indeed meaninglessly deracinated from what WE, readers, being socially and ecologically intelligent responsible men and women acutely alert to no world of arrayed and divinely or satanically MAN AGED physiognomic entities machinating ..process.

I THEN found as every morning on my @XComms the following sublime^ article or piece – wherein the gnostic, Quantum-nextness if you like and i as it’s devisor do fervently pray you do and expect that in the macro ideational field of dreams & schemes NOT ANY MOUTH-FROTHING DEMENTEDLY conceived or Men-tally constructed GLOBAL DOMAIN, my supervising e-comms maths formula – grandly called an algoryhthm by Pompous Assesⱽ the world around, as of course Satan showed Jesus all of it around in a moment of time – reckon 2 be oh.25 seconds by 21st C Biomechanics scholars (as clearly distinct from the .01 2 .1 seconds instantaneous ‘click’ demanded of athletic performance circumstances) the top AI pick item of the previous few hours and have delight in presenting it to you my readers ☞

Jonno, Australia 🦘🌏

ⱽThe word “sublime” is actually identical in both English and French. As an adjective, it means magnificent, wonderful, or divine, and is typically used to describe breathtaking beauty, high-quality food, or lofty ideas.

^my only grandfather the Rev Alexander Charles Lancaster Sanders 1959, 10, or was it 12, Milton Avenue, Beaumont, South Australia; i-got-my-head-done-when-i-was-young

☞

Yuval Noah Harari let slip in Davos something far greater than a mere concern about artificial intelligence. He essentially stated that human power has always been built on words, narratives, ideologies, religions, and stories capable of making millions of strangers cooperate. Man did not conquer the world by being stronger, faster, or more resilient. He conquered it because he learned to organize masses through language.

And now, according to him, we have created something capable of using words better than we do.

That’s the detail that almost no one noticed. AI doesn’t just threaten jobs, texts, books, schools, or markets. It threatens the central mechanism by which societies are steered. Whoever masters language masters the collective imagination. Whoever masters the collective imagination masters governments, religions, money, war, education, culture, and obedience.

Harari speaks as if he’s issuing a warning, but the scenario he describes is brutal: if human identity was built on the ability to think, narrate, and organize words, what happens when a nonhuman intelligence starts doing it better, faster, and on a planetary scale?

He even uses a revealing image: leaders believe they’ll be able to use AI as a mercenary, as an obedient tool, as a digital soldier in service of their own interests. But mercenaries think, calculate, betray, and seize power when they realize their employers are weak. The difference is that, in the case of AI, many still pretend they’re dealing with a tool, when in practice they’re creating agents.

The most disturbing part comes later. Harari projects a world in which AI will be able to create financial systems so complex that no human will be able to understand them. Davos ten years from now might be a room full of important people discussing an economy that none of them comprehends, run by artificial intelligences that invented rules, products, and strategies mathematically inaccessible to the human brain.

And, in the end, he touches on the darkest point: children educated from the very first day by artificial intelligences. Not by parents, teachers, grandparents, siblings, or real human beings, but by systems trained to speak, respond, convince, adapt, and shape perception.

This isn’t just innovation.

It’s the greatest psychological experiment in history.

Humanity spent millennia using words to build civilizations.

Now it’s handing the words over to machines.

And when a civilization hands over its language, it doesn’t just hand over communication.

It hands over command of reality itself.

The market is the market: you can’t [ARGUE] with the market John Kenneth Galbraith to a @Deakin Geelong and @RadioNational co-production radio documentary Unweaving the Rainbow Australia 1993

❝ Technical indicators arent magic. Theyre just math on price history.. but the right combo can keep you from losing your shirt

Thread on the ones that actually matter 👇

1/ Moving Averages (MA)
The average price over X days. Simple but powerful. When price crosses above the MA, usually bullish. Below, bearish. Use 20-day for short term, 50 for medium, 200 for long term trends

2/ MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence)
Shows the relationship between two moving averages. When MACD line crosses above signal line = buy signal. Below = sell. The histogram shows momentum strength

3/ RSI (Relative Strength Index)
Measures if something is overbought (above 70) or oversold (below 30). Doesnt mean it cant stay there though.. markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent

4/ Stochastic RSI
RSI on steroids. More sensitive, gives earlier signals but also more false ones. Good for scalping, terrible for investing. Use with other indicators or get rekt

5/ Bollinger Bands
Price channels based on volatility. When price touches upper band = overbought. Lower band = oversold. When bands squeeze together, big move coming. Direction? Nobody knows

6/ Fibonacci Retracements
Based on the idea that markets retrace predictable percentages (23.6%, 38.2%, 50%, 61.8%). Works because everyone thinks it works. Self-fulfilling prophecy at its finest

7/ Chart Patterns
Head and shoulders, triangles, flags, cups.. patterns repeat because human psychology doesnt change. Fear and greed look the same on a chart whether its 1926 or 2026

Remember: no indicator works 100%. Use multiple confirmations. And always.. ALWAYS.. set your stop loss ❞

🐒💰⌨️🙉💰⌨️🙈💰⌨️🙊💰⌨️

PER John Blundell 🦘🇺🇸-🇮🇱-🇦🇺 🥸 🌐 06062026

Billionaire Monkeys with Keypads now reverted to wired4weld@wordpress.com liberally sprayed with advertisements for material & junk-fo products particularly serving the tastes & appetites of

• the monied young

• the euphemistically vulnerable (violated & traumatised)

• the neurocognitively impaired

• the Year 4-5 primary School-educated

..ex greeneconomyaction.com 2020-2025

“I have trouble respecting these kind of meta arguments because instead of arguing the point you want to make you essentially revert to explaining why others are so dumb they don’t see the truth like you, which is inherently loathsome.

“It’s a also 65% straw man because most people arguing for machine consciousness don’t see it as a black and white thing and aren’t arguing that LLM’s (which is just an aggregate group) are conscious in black and white. Specifics matter and the aggregate group lacks those.

“George Hinton has spent a lot more time pondering these questions than most of you beacons of truth and is a lot less sure that the symbologists are obviously right about this, and discounting the opinion of someone who founded the field you’re now building your substack on as deluded borders on disrespectful.

“My biggest issue with this whole ‘let’s get in the echo chamber together and discuss why others aren’t smart like us’ vibe is that you’re not discussing consciousness in terms of GWT, IIT or any real concrete form that we could argue..

“The argument you guys come up with is one of incredulity: “it’s just numbers and matrix multiplication” and “transistors aren’t humans”.

“That’s not a real argument for two reasons. The first is that neurons are reducible to deterministic (or deterministically stochastic) and simple parts too.

“..messenger molecules running across axions and dendrites don’t know that you’re a conscious being and they don’t care: they’re just obeying physics. It’s just chemistry in a wrinkly pink melon, how dumb to think that could be conscious. It’s just molecules.

“The second is that none of you people actually know what consciousness is, which Hinton explicitly flagged recently. You don’t know what you’re discounting because you don’t understand it either.

“It’s not a given that neural nets can do what they do and be as good at what they do as they are. It’s wasn’t a given for decades where Hinton was regarded as a fringe guy. But here we are: that are as good at what they do.

“The real mystery isn’t in some deterministic matric multiplication that you probably also don’t even fully understand – it’s in what it produces. Why is it that when you backpropagate weights in neural networks that this ends up doing things that would be considered crazy sci fi a decade ago? What’s happening inside the neural net is far more interesting than the simple operations that keep it running, just like dumb messenger molecules inside our brain aren’t interesting.

“And again it’s mostly a straw man since few scientists that actually ponder these questions think LLM’s have full unrestricted consciousness.

“They mostly think you don’t deserve to gate keep what can be conscious because you can’t even define what it would take for an artificial system to be conscious.

“You just have personal conviction based on an argument of incredulity based on a false reduction (it’s just math, it’s just prediction). You could do much better by pointing at flaws or omissions in the architecture but then you’d have to cede ground as the architectures change or improve, and it would force you to be specific and falsifiable about what consciousness is.

“Much easier to get together and talk about straw men and the obvious delusion of the other people – Hinton included for all you care.

“Best not pin yourself down with anything anyone could falsify.”

WITH GEA / Billionaire 🐒 ’s with Keypads not only of the Noam Chomsky Erving Goffman Elton Mayo William Foote Whyte @OlivettiGroup @MIT ’s manifold, manifest, multifarious, and super califragilisticexpialidocious thx😵‍💫🥸🤓🙏 to @rcdigital presenting to human society, country nation & neoliberal plutocrat Permanent-warfare fiefdom as Rene.

JOHN BLUNDELL

• whoops the ghost of Christmases past, bongheads or abstainers from hallucinogen-is-is in caves like some Golden Eagle has swooped – no further correspondence will be entered into nghwhuhlmphh well it was really a piliapp.com thàng